Thursday, May 29, 2014

A Subscription to Social Interaction


A Subscription to Social Interaction

I.                    Specific Hypothesis

If the complex framework of the structural-functional approach[1] are the theaters of our conscience that control a large percentage of how people interact with us; then like night and day the “arena of inequality” and the theaters of our conscience are co-eternal amongst a society that subscribes to sensory and symbolic deprivation. Then the social-conflict approach[2], which contains two important conflict approaches in society:  Gender-Conflict[3] and Race-Conflict Approach[4], subscribes to symbolic deprivation and its manifest and latent functions, which has a direct effect on how we perform specific task, in a specific manner, at a specific time, causing us to use logic, emotion, external, and internal forces as an excuse when we make decisions in the “arena of inequality” as to why we should ‘not do’ or ‘do’ what messages seep into our conscience directing us, either as a collective or as an individual, “generating conflict and change.”    

II.                 Structural-Function Approach

 

“In 1960 Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin[5] identified three types of illegitimate juvenile subcultures; criminal, conflict, and retreatist.” (Hagen, 2013, p. 164)  This identification condensed two and a half centuries of research, bringing understanding to crime, the criminal element, criminal origins, and how the demonological theory is connected to the origins of crime.  Cloward and Ohlin gave great understanding from a sociological perspective. “At the heart of sociology is a special point of view called the sociological perspective.  Comprised of four basic components that make it unique:  General Social Patterns, Strange in the Familiar, Society in everyday life, Marginally/Crisis.” (University, 2014)     “All social structures, from a simple handshake to complex religious rituals, function to keep society going, at least in its present form.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 14)  When meeting up with friends and/or family to socialize, there is an immediate formal greeting, followed by a communicating of current news or information to one another, and then moving on to the reason for their meeting.  That reason can be the smoking of a blunt, a romantic rendezvous, a church function, school function, etc.  The reason for the meeting is the manifest function, and any unrecognized or unintended consequence of that meeting, whether good or bad, is the latent function.  Social dysfunction comes into play when we are not aware of the messages that seep into our conscience directing us in a certain social pattern of conflict and change.  Sensory deprivation and Symbolic deprivation come through symbols and a person’s status and role, at social functions.  At these social functions when people “don’t hit it off” their theaters conflict, making them socially incompatible.  To sum it all up, how we deal with or respond to these roles, status, and symbols either begin our social constructs of reality or maintain our current social contract, causing us to become socially functional or socially dysfunctional. 

III.               Sensory Deprivation and Symbolic Deprivation

Sensory Deprivation and Symbolic Deprivation are two types of deprivation that are the foundation of what occurs in the “arena of inequality,” and are part of the theme of this research paper.  Sensory and Symbolic deprivation starts out as manifest functions in the “arena of inequality” that leads to latent functions, which are at the root of the sociological approaches, supported by sociological data as evidence supporting my hypothesis.  In chapter 8 of Williams’ & Arrigo’s book, Ethics, Crime, and Criminal Justice (2012), on page 153, they explore Bentham’s Pleasure Principle.  For instance, fecundity is a latent function of sensory and symbolic deprivation as they compare and contrast studying for an exam and going out with friends. Even though you retain all the material you need for a test or class discussion, you miss out on socializing with friends, meeting new people, and/or making new contacts.  In summary, what symbols one uses to identify people, places, things, or events with to acquire a perspective, shows the environment and activities one took part in while developing in the “arena of inequality,” progressing through conflict, and changing physically and morally, using the Social-Conflict Approach.

 

1.      Gender-Conflict focuses on the inequality and conflict between men and women,” (Macionis, 2010, p. 15)  while Gender Stratification “is also about social hierarchy.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 334)  The social hierarchy of Gender Stratification “affects the opportunities and challenges we face throughout our lives.”  “Gender is at work even before the birth of a child, because especially in lower-income nations, parents hope that their firstborn will be a boy rather than a girl.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 332)  Moreover, “Parents even send gender messages in the way they handle infants.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 332)  Most women identify objects, places, and things through sexual objects, private parts, or sexual positions, while most men identify those same objects, places, and things through action and violence.  This fact is supported by Macionis (2010) in his textbook entitled Sociology, on page 332:  “…The female world revolves around cooperation and emotion, and the male world puts a premium on independence and action.”   “[A] national monthly survey of approximately 60,000 households conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  Among the age groupings of those 35 years and older, women had earnings that ranged from 75 percent to 78 percent of the earnings of their male counterparts. Among younger workers, the earnings differences between women and men were not as great.” (Statistics, 2013)  This financial data indicates how the family structure has become co-eternal with the individuals that make up one’s family, and not like it was during the first 80 years of the 20th century. 

2.      Race-Conflict plays a very important role in social interaction.  “This is why sociologist study patterns of” interaction ranging from Assimilation and Segregation to Genocide, Pluralism, and Miscegenation; whether it is a biologically transmitted trait, shared culturally, or just ‘different’ from societal norms.  Race and ethnicity in the United States has always, and will always be a factor in conflict and inequality. “Among both women and men age 25 and older, the weekly earnings of those without a high school diploma ($386 for women and $508 for men) were about two- fifths of those with a bachelor’s degree or higher ($1,001 for women and $1,371 for men) in 2012…earnings for women with a college degree have increased by 28 percent since 1979, while those of male college graduates have risen by [only] 17 percent.” (Statistics, 2013) While “[J]obs with the highest concentration of women” are Cosmetologist (93%), Child Care Workers (94%), and Secretary or Administrative Asst. (96.7%) (Macionis, 2010, p. 335),  “[T]he amount of housework, which is usually considered ‘women’s work’, has gone down since women have started being co-bread winners of their households, but their share of it remains indistinguishable.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 337)  The manifest functions of the law are to maintain order in society, but its latent function produces a hard lesson learned by the individual who breaks the law.  “…the vast majority of those arrested or labeled as criminal are from lower social classes.  Criminality for traditional crimes is higher among lower-class individuals, totally apart from bias in statistics or the administration of justice.  Part of the excessively high rate is likely to be due to their lack of power and sophistication in shielding themselves from formal litigation proceedings.” (Hagen, 2013, p. 65)  In addition, Delbert Elliot’s Integrative Theory “involves synthesizing the gap between aspirations and achievement, attachment and commitment, and exposure to identifying with deviant peers.” (Hagen, 2013, pp. 199-200)  James Flynn, “observed in the 80s that IQ scores had consistently increased in the past decades”… “3 IQ points per decade and thought that intelligence itself had not increased, but abstract problem-solving ability had, making people more intellectually capable”… “Factors that may have played a role are computers, long-schooling, media stimulation, better health and nutrition, and more parental attention (Hagen, 2013, p. 151).  These statistics and facts stratify what symbols are used and the persons that use them in the “arena of inequality,” and how race, gender, and symbols contribute to the constructs of the theaters that play a large role in manifest and latent functions in social interaction. 

3.      “Three waves of feminist movements in the United States” have brought us to 2014, where the woman is equal in every aspect of today’s society.  Feminism is also at the core of sensory and symbolic deprivation.  Sexual activity every day, deprivation of sexual activity, or deprivation of sexual affection can lead to one having feelings of inadequacy which lead to a short temper, committing an act of violence, or withdrawing from society unhealthily.  Even though suicide rates are higher for men than women in the world, in the United States suicide rates in the U.S. “occur where people live far apart from one another.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 14)  The psychology of a woman says while men want to have sex with multiple partners, women want to have sex multiple times with a stable, long-term partner (Kalsher, 2008, p. 310).  This desire to pleasure themselves, derives from a ‘double your pleasure’ and ‘double your fun’ way of thinking by women that is derived from Bentham’s seven pleasure principles.  “It demands immediate, total gratification and is not capable of considering the potential costs of seeking this goal.” (Kalsher, 2008, p. 342)  Somatotypes are body builds that relate to personality characteristics (temperaments).”  They can be found in, The Joint (2014), a local newspaper that features both men and women whom were arrested during a certain time period, one can see that somatotyping is no longer a clear indicator for a man or woman’s personality, but biological theories like Assimilation, Genocide, Segregation, Pluralism, and Miscegenation are key factors in “making us aware of the many ways in which sensory and symbolic deprivation places men and women in positions of power in the “arena of inequality.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 15)  Carol “Gilligan’s work on moral development led her to conclude that there are significant gender differences in the ways men and women respond to moral dilemmas” (Williams & Arrigo, 2012, p. 134).  This is where the true Exchange comes in between men and women.  The exchange is not sex for money, love, etc., but “that morality may very well develop out of more than a[s] single orientation:   one focusing on justice, rights, and logic (for men) and another on interpersonal relationships, compassion, and care (for women)” (Williams & Arrigo, 2012, p. 134) each sex is a delicate counter-balance for the other. 

 

4.      The Symbolic-Interaction Approach is a micro-level orientation, and the “result from the ongoing experiences of tens of millions of people.”  Furthermore, society is nothing more than the shared reality that people construct as they interact (Macionis, 2010, p. 17).  Some symbols are universal while some vary with nationality, race, and ethnicity.  Everything from “[A] word, a whistle, a wall covered in graffiti, a flashing red light, [or] a raised fist” are just some examples of symbols that are used within various cultures through cultural folkways (Macionis, 2010, p. 62).  Some societies create new symbols all the time, like “cyber-symbols” used for texting and/or Instant Messaging.  In The Final Call newspaper (2014), it stated that, “Mr. Powell described what it would be like taking a computer microchip and asking the finest scientists back in the mid-1500s to reverse engineer the technology then explain what it was.  They would not have the technological tools, nor the arc of knowledge to even begin to describe or interpret what they were looking at.” (Muhammad, 2014)    We are in this very context as we have arrived at present day internet.  We have a marvel of technology, but cannot explain past the proverbial depths of what we have.  In “Columbus, Georgia, in front of the River Center, on Broad Street, is located one of the Fountain City’s greatest fountains entitled, DRAMA.”  “The stone water sculpture embodies” technology created by god and man.  “The force of the water and sequencing of lights are all modulated by computer” (Muhr), as is the theaters of our minds.  This symbolic interaction is the basis for the Symbolic-Interaction Approach which plays a large role in constructing the theaters in the human mind, playing at different levels of the conscience and sub-conscience mind.  

 

“Dramaturgical analysis offers a fresh look at the concepts of status and role.  A status is like a part in a play, and a role serves as a script, supplying dialogue and action for the characters.  Goffman described each individual’s “performance” as the presentation of self.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 145) 

 

The manifest function of the first Georgia state constitution was to establish statehood.  It was drafted in 1776, a year later in 1777 another constitution was drafted, “followed by the constitutions of 1789, 1798, 1861, 1877, 1945, 1976, and 1983.” (West, 2006)  Every year this constitution was re-drafted, its latent function evinced a different theater of intelligence being played on the great state of Georgia.  Noah Hutton on his web page, The Beautiful Brain, explains in detail how these theaters are constructed.  “Some cognitive scientists, such as Robert Stickgold of Harvard, have used the relationship between the seen and unseen in theater as a good metaphor for the relationship between the conscious and non-conscious activity in our brains when we sleep. The metaphor goes something like this: One leading theory about sleep, called the activation-synthesis hypothesis, posits that sleep is a time for the brain to sift through all the experiences and thoughts we’ve kept in our short-term buffer throughout the day, decide what’s worth keeping, and then weave those survivors into the complex web of memory we already have within us, for us to carry along until tomorrow, at least. That process happens quite unconsciously– in the “backstage” regions of the mind, as we sleep. This process of sifting– of activation, then synthesis– generates waves of activation throughout the brain, probing neurons that store information not only from what happened that day, but also activating those that deal with longer-term memories that may be of associative use as we try to relate the new stuff to the older stuff, and see how the new memories might be of use in preparing for the future, a constant pursuit of the mind (Hutton, 2012).”  The psychodynamic view of these theaters or dreams are best described by Sigmund Freud as a latent function of the brain,  “…Freud, who popularized the view that dreams reveal the unconscious---thoughts, impulses, and wishes, that lie outside the realm of conscious experience (Kalsher, 2008, pp. 137-138).  If dreams aren’t reflections of hidden wishes or impulses... According to this perspective, dreams are simply our subjective experience of what is, in essence, random neural activity in the brain.” (Kalsher, 2008, p. 138)   Whereas the physiological view suggest the manifest function that “dreams are usually silent, but are filled with visual images.”(Kalsher, 2008, p. 138)  Some dreams cause the individual to experience smells, touch, and taste.  “Those waves of activation end up seeding our dream consciousness– the theory goes– by creating a stream of objects, people, feelings, places, and everything else, that sort of “bubbles up” from that non-conscious background memory-sorting process, and surfaces in our conscious, dream-state. In this sense, it’s that raw material that bubbles up from the backstage process that is seized upon by our conscious minds– the fully-lit, gazed-upon stage of the theater– which then weaves it all together, onstage, into our dream narrative, imposing meaning, as we do, in the strangest–or sometimes most poignant– of places.” (Hutton, 2012)  When our mind shifts back-n-forth between the material and spiritual world, we experience a form of psychosis that is a blessing and a curse at the same time which allows us to see the truth about ourselves, others, situations, and events; taking these treasures of God to enrich our lives, but it is too often we succumb to the pressures of these blessing, committing suicide or homicide. 

IV.             Sociological Data 

Through Sensory and Symbolic deprivation we see how all the approaches of sociology are applied.  In the critical review in Macionis (2010) textbook entitled Sociology, on page 117, it states: 

“Like the work of Piaget, Kohlberg’s model explains moral development in terms of distinct stages.  But whether this model applies to people in all societies remains unclear.  Further, many people in the United States apparently never reach the post-conventional level of moral reasoning, although exactly why is still an open question.  Another problem with Kohlberg’s research is that his subjects were all boys.  He committed a common research error, described in Chapter 2 [of this same text], by generalizing the results of male subjects to all people.”

 

When messages seep into our conscious, they are latent directives from that higher power within ourselves directing us to ‘act as if’, so that the overall plan of the higher power is carried out. Sometimes we are directed to be kind, and don’t feel like being kind, or we are directed to be mean to someone, but danger and common sense says do not.  As human beings we have ‘free will’, and it is this free will that allows us to make the choice of ‘to do’ or ‘not to do’.  This is Civil Disobedience, and “civil disobedience involves a peaceful refusal to obey existing laws that are felt to be unjust---a conscientious disrespect for laws that conflict with one’s commitment to higher ethical principles.” (Williams & Arrigo, 2012, p. 128)  

1.      Society and culture have a lot of influence on the construct of a person’s reality, social media is the biggest influence.  All the mediums that are used for work, rest, and play, are the avenues through which the “arena of inequality” functions, establishing the norms of society; by which rewards and punishments are handed out.  Social Media is a manifest function through which people meet, work, and communicate every day, whether they are on the phone, Facebook chatting, Skyping, or Instant Messaging.  Soul Train was a dance show started by Don Cornelius in 1970, which featured current singers and their music; played for a studio full of guest who would dance to every song for one-hour non-stop.  In 2014 there is no more Soul Train, only reality T.V. shows like, American Idol, Survivor, The Amazing Race, Hell’s Kitchen, using average ordinary everyday type people, truly giving them their 15 minutes of fame.  Made sitcoms out of dramaturgical analysis like Person of Interest, 2 Broke Girls, and Law and Order:  SVU which contains everyday life of our new millennium.  Moving on to movies like Thor:  The Dark World, Captain America:  The Winter Soldier, 42, Wolf on Wall Street and musical creations like Jay-Z’s Magna Carter…Holy Grail.  The protagonist in these movies shows the heroics of men and women from the 80s and 90s, the decades that produced the Millennials.  They show the bias of how real-life heroes were received prior to 1985, in the “Canyon of Heroes” when Vietnam vets were finally hailed for their great sacrifice in the jungles of Vietnam.  With a change in late night talk show host on the Tonight Show and David Letterman, along with Jimmy Kimmel and the return of The Arsenio Hall Show, and all their move from studios in New York to their L.A. counterparts.  Even the game show Jeopardy did a premium show entitled Champion of Decades where champions from the 80s, 90s, up to present day competed against one another in a present day forum, this premium denotes “a shift forward” into a new sociological frontier.  Not only combining sociological theories, but technological devices that were once separate devices like the calculator, planner, phone, laptop, iPAD, Nook, GPS, camera, video camera, phone book, mail, etc., now you can purchase a Nokia 1025 phone that is all these devices, and more, into one; or purchase an app to acquire a feature your phone doesn’t have. The next six questions offer an alternative to how these comforting pieces of technology affect us negatively:  “How many contacts do you have in your cellphone right now? How many of those are personal contacts or business contacts? How many jobs have you held in the past 5 years? Are you still doing the same exact thing that you were doing last year? Are you being targeted on social media? Are you being targeted everywhere you go?” (Wells, 2013).

2.      Georgia’s Safe Carry Protection Act “takes effect July 1” (Howard, 2014)  and the state of Colorado’s recent legalization of marijuana are examples of political structures at work in the “arena of inequality.”  Acts of god are also at work in the “arena of inequality,” evinced by tornados “from Arkansas, Oklahoma and Iowa to Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee,” and North Carolina. (Muskal & Pearce, 2014)  Social structures began changing in the early part of the 20th century as African-Americans began to break the color barrier into Sports, Hollywood, Armed Forces, Medicine, Science, etc.; now African-Americans are breaking a new barrier.  This year during the Nation of Islam’s annual Savior’s Day event, Louis Farrakhan gave a lecture entitled, How Strong is our Foundation:  Can we Survive?   This lecture and its title alone, along with Oprah Winfrey’s new television network, OWN, and the television network, Bounce, is evidence of African-Americans and women [minorities] breaking new barriers in the 21st century.  Turning a once bias into groundbreaking corporate entities.  On the eve when a 17-year old African-American gets accepted into 5 Ivy League colleges,

“Coffey was raised in D.C.’s Ward 8 by his hard-working mother in a single-parent household. Growing up in the less than financially ideal environment—mired in stereotypes and roadblocks—did not discourage Coffey and he offered the following advice to children who struggle in similar circumstances.   Banneker is known for its strict rules, including no cell phones and no going to lockers between classes. According to Principal Anita Berger, the strategy has paid off big time. One hundred percent of Banneker students consistently graduate high school and go on to receive offers from colleges and universities.” (Staff, 2014)

an eighth grade African-American fires a .357 magnum at a rival crew, hitting and killing an innocent bystander.  You can see the bias in comparing and contrasting Khaton and Coffey’s lives in the “arena of inequality.”  Similarly as young African-Americans you can see their promise, but also how they are victims to their own theater of violence (culture) in many ways:

A 14-year-old gunman opened fire during a dispute on a New York City bus in Brooklyn on Thursday evening, fatally shooting a 39-year-old passenger in the head.  The attack happened about 6:20 p.m. on a B15 bus on Marcus Garvey Boulevard near Lafayette Avenue in Bedford-Stuyvesant. The police said there was an argument involving several teenagers on the bus, though they did not know what it was about. The gunman fired more than one shot, the police said, and witnesses described hearing three or four” (Lee, 2014)

Another interpretation of these two young men’s lives, who went in two different directions is,  Ivy League or Penitentiary, whether higher or lower, all institutions promote some form of learning. This is clear evidence of new theaters emerging. 

V.                Conclusion

The theaters in our conscience are our body’s biological and natural security app that sets up a world, in our heads, that takes care of us. Those theaters that are closer to the forefront of our mind is based on our working memory (short-term memory), and those in the deeper levels of the sub-conscience are based on our unemployed memory (long-term memory) (Kalsher, 2008, p. 203).  Our working memory is the foundation for our overall intelligence, and is activated by using internal and external retrieval cues (Kalsher, 2008, pp. 204-5).  Symbolic deprivation produces conflict in the “arena of inequality.”  This type of deprivation begins the “social constructs of our reality” in the theaters of our minds,  setting forth stipulations in social contracts, which will cause others and ourselves, to identify status, role, sets, skills, abilities, limits, beliefs, personality types, and “social construction of emotions and how we manage them.”  As a result, some are very successful in the “arena of inequality” while others succumb to the pressures of conflict leading to sensory deprivation, which is a more severe form of deprivation. Furthermore, how we maintain that reality is determined by how the external world upholds to the stipulations set forth in our social contract.  Because the “arena of inequality” always produces conflict, challenges to our contract, in whole or in part, keeps constant upgrades on that contract.  These theaters determine our personal space in social interaction, helping us identify boundaries in the “arena of inequality” that must be protected.   As a result we protect ourselves, the symbols in our theaters, and maintain our contract by being aggressive and/or on the offensive, assertive, and/or “defensive to some kind of attack.” (Wikipedia, 2014)  In the process of protecting our personal space we produce conflict and change, declaring our independence in the “arena of inequality,” utilizing the eight principles of felicity calculus.  Cultural universals are contained in all societies and cultures, but the difference in symbols within those societies and cultures are based on race, gender, age, and income class.  It is through interaction that we transform elements of the world into symbols that stimulate us on a consistent basis wherever we may go. The Symbolic-Interaction Approach forms the self, according to George Mead’s theory of social behaviorism, via social experience (Macionis, 2010, p. 118).  We socially interact throughout our daily lives, pursuing short and long term objectives, conforming to socioeconomic folkways and norms. 



[1] Structural-Functional Approach – framework for building theory that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.
[2] Social-Conflict Approach – framework for building theory that sees society as an “arena of inequality” that generates conflict and change.
[3] Gender-Conflict Approach – a point of view that focuses on inequality and conflict between women and men.
[4] Race-Conflict Approach – point of view that focuses on inequality and conflict between people of different racial and ethnic categories.
[5] Differential opportunity theory – working class juveniles will choose one or another type of gang adjustment to their anomic situation depending on the availability of illegitimate opportunity structures in their neighborhood.  Hagen, F. E. (2013). Introduction to Criminology: Theories, Methods, and Criminal Behavior 8th ed. In F. E. Hagen, Introduction to Criminology: Theories, Methods, and Criminal Behavior 8th ed. (p. 164). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

The Root of All Evil


In 1960 Cloward and Ohlin identified three types of illegitimate juvenile subcultures; criminal, conflict, and retreatist. (Hagen, 2013, p. 164)  This identification condensed two and a half centuries of research, bringing understanding to what was previously not understood.  The first identification of the criminal subculture is evident in Wu-Tang Clan’s 1993 album Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers);  In the opening of this song Raekwon talks about two for fives, and how the other drug dealers have garbage down the way, then the song comes in.  Raekwon opens with how he grew up as a youth, and the motivation to want success.  He raps about the subculture in Staten Island when he speaks of, “ making his way on fire escapes”, but with all that theft, extortion, and property offenses, he finally figures out what he is doing wrong, and begins to hang out with a clique of drug dealers.  He learns to make money by selling kilos of cocaine; converting the powder cocaine into crack cocaine, and selling rocks.  Back to the two for five, this was criminal opportunity that allowed him to achieve success.  I grew up in the 1990s not only listening to artist like Wu-Tang Clan, Snoop Doggy Dogg, Dr. Dre, Dogg Pound, Ice Cube, Bone Thugs-n-Harmony, DJ Quik, MC Eiht, Mac 10, N.W.A., Outkast, MC Ren, Nate Dogg, all while I was gangbanging and selling drugs.  In 1994 I had returned from California to the slums of South Phenix City, Alabama, and made up in my mind that it was time to grow up and be a man.   I got serious about making money.  I was influenced by the ‘disorganized slums’ of Los Angeles, California.  Even though gangs were not common, they were present in Columbus/Phenix City at the time.  I did not know that I was a part of a group that was denied both legitimate and illegitimate sources of access to status, so I resorted to violence through fist fighting and ‘peeling caps[1]’, with a chrome .380 Lorcin that I bought from a ‘crackhead’, for a “bad rep” and prestige. (Hagen, 2013, p. 164)   The 1960s was a transitional time period that provided a lot of answers.  1960-1980 gave birth to children known as ‘similac babies[2].  Exactly the same, the only difference between a similac baby and a ‘crack baby’ from the 80s is similac babies were born in transition, receiving all the nutrients or benefits of two and a half centuries of research; crack babies born after1980, received no information because the 1980s spawned a new era that required individuals to ‘put in work[3] or punk someone out.  In N.W.A.s song, Compton’s-n-the House (N.W.A., 1988) and Gangsta, Gangsta (N.W.A., 1988), took the ‘retreatist’ subculture of ‘double failures’ and made heroes out of them.  Unable to succeed either in the legitimate or illegitimate opportunity structures, they sought status through “kicks” and “highs” of drug and alcohol abuse. Most ‘double failures’ have done long terms in prison, whether in a single-man cell or population, most become ‘institutionalized[4], learning law, psychology, art, finances, business, education, etc., but unable to function properly outside of the controlled environment in which he or she was incarcerated due to the inability to create or hold-on to friendships, intimate relationships, resources, and/or opportunities.  These subcultures become the individual’s reference group and primary source of self-esteem.” (Hagen, 2013, p. 164)  In the second verse of C.R.E.A.M., GZA says, “…life is hell; living in the world ain’t no different than living in a cell”, so while in this world they become targets for individuals in the community and corporations to use as stepping stones to create opportunities for profit.  Being targeted by friends, intimate friends, businesses, corporations, and law enforcement; being used as the means for these individuals or entities to achieve their ends.   Whether the ‘double failure’  is truly a sacrifice/scapegoat or not, he or she is the diversion to keep attention away from the white-collar criminals, as well as leniency of punishment because they are the reason that the ‘double failure’ is a failure in the first place.  In my fictional story entitled, Dawning Achievements, I state: “…I attended political events, media events, school functions, and talked politics with gangsters who were influential men and women in the bi-city.  These people knew of me, and some of them did not like me.  I knew who was doing what to me; I was no longer in Ted's shadow, but I was still a shadow of a man.”   In this rumination the character here speaks of why he is successful in a city that has very high standards. 

 

Expelled student brought civil rights action against state university president, alleging procedural due process violations, and against board of regents, asserting state-law contract claim. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Doc. No. 1:08-cv-00077-CAP, denied president summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and denied board of regents summary judgment based on Eleventh Amendment immunity. President and board of regents appealed (Barnes v. Zacchari, 2012).  In 2007, in the wake of the massacre at Virginia Tech, Ronald Zaccari, the President of Valdosta State University at the time, “administratively withdrew” (expelled) Thomas Hayden Barnes, a student, on the ground that Barnes presented a “clear and present danger” to the campus.  Even though policy states that Barnes was due notice of charges and a hearing to answer to them, Zacchari made a decision that was not in accordance with school policy, policy of TCSG, and the 11th amendment.    In Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 (1985), it states that more is required in an official-capacity action, however, for a governmental entity is liable under sec. 1983 only when the entity itself is a ‘moving force’ behind the deprivation (Kentucky v. Graham, 1985). Corporate policy usually, a documented set of broad guidelines, formulated after an analysis of all internal and external factors that can affect a firm's objectives, operations, and plans.  Formulated by the firm's board of directors, corporate policy lays down the firm's response to known and knowable situations and circumstances. It also determines the formulation and implementation of strategy, and directs and restricts the plans, decisions, and actions of the firm's officers in achievement of its objectives; also called company policy.” (Finance, 2013) 


Corporate crime refers to crimes by business or officials, committed on behalf of the employing organizations (Hagen, 2013, p. 282).  However, the information sought on organized crime or white-collar crime is hard to get hold of, so therefore we rely on other means of obtaining information.  There are four ways authorities obtain information on organized crime and the figures that make up these organizations.  Group A:  Informers, Investigators/hearings, Transcripts/depositions; Group B:  Media, Reporting, Biographies; Group C:  Government Reports, Law Enforcement research, and Archives; and Group D:  Observation and Interviews (University, 2013).  These four sources are how information is compiled on crime figures or figures that are under investigation for a number of white-collar offenses, where he or she has been elusive from authorities.  There are four types of organized crime:  Political-Social, Mercenary, In-Group Oriented, and Syndicate Crime.  Political-Social consists mostly of political crimes, and crimes committed by militant social movements. Domestic terrorism has existed for more than a century, dating back at least to the 1901 assassination of President William McKinley. Extremists across the political spectrum -- including white supremacists, Puerto Rican separatists, abortion opponents, and environmentalists -- have used a variety of terrorist tactics to pursue their goals.  While homegrown Muslim extremists have proven more lethal in Europe than in the United States, U.S. authorities continue to worry about the prospect of attacks by militant Muslims who are American citizens.  The FBI classifies domestic terrorist threats mostly by political motive, dividing them into three main categories: left wing, right wing, and special interest. Religious sects have also been connected with terrorist incidents. Another type of domestic threat cited by federal law-enforcement officials in the period after September 11 is the alleged presence of Islamic extremists in the United States, operating either as an arm of a foreign organization or a homegrown cell (Fletcher, 2008).  The second type, Mercenary or Predatory organized crimes are committed by groups geared toward direct or personal profit; an example of this type would be a street gang.  The third type, In-Group Oriented are crimes committed, so that the individual can experience a high or thrill or to just be accepted by one of the gang.  The last type, is Syndicate Crime, and is what all the other types are under in a chain of ‘criminal command’.  Syndicate crime commits crime for illicit gain; they use force, intimidation, and threats; members obey a chain of command, with an oath of allegiance and secrecy; the organization provides protection and immunity from political corruption and prosecution (University, 2013).  In our e-Acitivity for week nine of my CRJ 105 class, it asked us to research a recent or local case where a gang member was charged with racketeering.  Placing emphasis on the ‘Syndicate’ type of crime, which is apparent in all subcultures, even street-level gangs or the ‘Mercenary or Predatory’ type.  Most of your racketeering had its height in the 1990s, but it was at this same time that law enforcement and criminologist came to understand that they were not dealing with the myth of a ‘super criminal’, but a reality of syndicated criminals and gangs on every level, created by the very system designed to punish and deter criminal activity.  In N.W.A.’s song entitled, Always into Something, on the last verse MC Ren expresses how the ‘super criminal’ believes, and how each member of syndicated street-level gangs believe (N.W.A, 1991). 
The ‘big dirty secret[1] of judges, police, correctional officers, politicians, lawyers, prosecutors, and other government officials are ‘soft’ on corporate crime because they are the ones who are committing the corporate crimes.   “The corporate opportunity doctrine (“COD”) is a common law doctrine that limits a corporate fiduciary’s ability to pursue new business prospects individually without first offering them to the corporation. Conflicts over allocation of corporate opportunities constitute particularly thorny questions in corporate law, since the parties’ respective interests are not merely misaligned, but are rather in profound contradiction to one another. In addition, COD conflicts are likely in situations where two or more firms share common officers and/or directors, and particularly within the parent-subsidiary context.  Formally, the doctrine is a subspecies of the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and it has been a mainstay in the corporate precedents of virtually every state for well over a century (notwithstanding the existence of several doctrines that similarly restrict the appropriation of corporate property by fiduciaries1). Nevertheless, the precise contours of the doctrine remain somewhat elusive, and, perhaps consequently, its application is widely thought to be unpredictable.” (Hashmall, 2001) Pre-twentieth century many acts that are considered white-collar crimes were not illegal until present day.  White-collar crimes are given less publicity than those crimes committed by street-level criminals, but with more public concern with corporate crime there has been more coverage of these criminals when they are caught (Hagen, 2013, pp. 318-319).  In a 2010 Oliver Stone directed, Wall Street:  The Money Never Sleeps, starring Micheal Douglas as Gordon Gekko, and Shia Lebeouf as Jake Moore, shows the tradition of robbery and rip offs on Wall Street, in this tale of how Gordon Gekko, the teacher was once a Wall Street mogul, but was taken down by his student, Bretton James, played by Josh Brolin who is now the Wall Street mogul.  Now comes along Jake Moore, whom is soon to be married to Gekko’s daughter, a bright star at his company dealing in fossil fuels and alternative forms of energy.  Gekko needs money to regain his position, not his throne, but his position.  Gekko also wants to take down his nemesis, and former student, Bretton James.  He uses Jake Moore’s naivety to take down Bretton James, and acquire 100 million USD that he placed in his daughter’s Swiss bank account in the 1980s.  The money never sleeps.  It doesn’t eat, it doesn’t drink, it has no habits, and it doesn’t fold.  Like the devil, all it does is seek out a willing victim, and victimization spreads like wild fire.  These actions fall well within Merton’s theory and modes of personality adaptation, but it is the criticism of his theory that I cite here.  “The theory appears to dwell on lower-class criminality, thus failing to consider law breaking among the elite.  I. Taylor et al. express this point:  “Anomie theory stands accused of predicting too little bourgeois criminality and too much proletarian criminality” (Hagen, 2013, pp. 159-161).  Because Syndicated crime is present on every level, it now becomes paradigm of the elite criminals keeping their white-collars clean with oxyclean[2], and by making the blue collars get and stay dirty by keeping them in a revolving door of missed opportunities and unnecessary actions that lead them back to prison.  Crimes committed by the corporate fiduciaries are due impart to the same reason that most blue-collar crimes are committed.  Most of your white-collar offenders are caught through some personal habit that leads to an act that is morally wrong and/or against the law, committing this ‘bad act’, is how they are caught.   They have been excluded from their circle of criminal corporate cohorts that deem them a ‘high risk’ to their operations.  Most either fall all the way to rock bottom becoming ‘bums’ or just white-collar deadbeats. 
Due process of Law says that, “… No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”, this is why Standard Operating Procedures, Administrative Regulations, School Policy, Corporate Policy, Governmental Policy, etc. all exist as subsets of state and federal law; to keep, maintain order, and a balance that was envisioned by President Lincoln, “… that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom— and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” (Lincoln, 2005)  


[1] Peeling caps – shooting to kill
[2] Similac baby – a child born between in the 1970s, that received all the nutrients an nourishments of two and a half centuries of research. 
[3] Put in work – a term coined by the Los Angeles (westcoast) subculture of gangs in the 1980s that meant to sell drugs, fight, kill, rob, etc., and do recon for the neighborhood and organization.
[4] Institutionalized – when an individual has been incarcerated for a long period of time, and cannot function outside that particular institution.
[5] The big dirty secret – that the criminal justice system is soft on white-collar crime
[6] Oxyclean – a method used by white-collar criminals to protect their operations, keeping the informants, snitches, and liabilites out of their circles.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Gangbangers


On the track entitled Dogg Pound 4 Life, off the Above the Rim:  Motion Picture Soundtrack (1994), embodies present day ‘culture of violence’, and demonstrates the mode of personality ‘innovator’ as described by Merton.  The culture of terrorist and secret agents dominated the scene during the 20th century, but since the 1980s (Y2K)  up to present day, the subculture of gang violence within the continental United States has taken over from the international activity of terrorist and secret agents; this is evidenced by major events from 2000 up to present day.  Gangbanging is a subculture that has many distinctive ‘types’.  In the first verse of the track, Kurupt is going to ‘clear out[1] a spot[2], occupied by a rival gang or another group, which is apparently profitable in drug sales.  Also he is out to prove to himself, his OGs[3], fellow members, and ‘hood[4]’ that he is willing to commit ‘murder’ for his ‘set[5]’ or betterment of the hood.  In the hook you hear them say, “This is Dogg Pound fo life…I just don’t give a fuck”.  Daz Dillinger in the second verse raps on ‘coming up[6] in the dope game.  He starts out as a street level drug dealer, but moves up from ounces to kilos of cocaine.  Situational violence is evidence here because he also talks about how he has to carry a ‘strap[7]’ to protect his newly acquired spot of sales.  In the third verse Snoop Dogg talks about how “…yo, boy it’s a G with a blast degree.  187 ain’t shit but a misdemeanor.  I seen a lot niggas “come up”, a few niggas “done up[8]”.  Some rest in peace with they Khakis heavy creased…”  This song embodies Miller’s focal concerns[9], but Human Ecology[10] best explains this subculture of gun violence.  Viewing the city as a growing organism, the heterogeneous contact of racial and ethnic groups in the city often leads to competition for status and space, as well as conflict, accommodation, acculturation, assimilation, or amalgamation (Hagen, 2013, p. 165).

In her report on gun control  Nancy Cordes ( 2013) reported that a new bill would be written that would close the loop on ‘gun show’ purchases, and stregnthen mental health reporting in background checks from the states to the feds.  “Current gun control laws in the United States are varied by state; federal level laws are most often very broad, widespread rules.  Title I of US federal gun control laws is the Gun Control Act of 1968. This gun control law prohibits certain categories of individuals from possessing firearms. Some of the categories include convicted felons, fugitives from justice, unlawful drug users, and those who have been dishonorably discharged from the military.  This gun control law also prohibits people younger than 18 years old from "possessing handguns or handgun ammunition with certain exceptions for employment, target practice, education," and certain outlined defensive purposes.  The next most important gun control law is the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.” (LAWS.com, 2013)  For the first time mental health will be instituted into background checks for individuals who want to purchase hand guns.  This is a good thing because it furthers the reach of keeping guns out of the hands of those that are mentally unstable, and will perpetuate workplace, school, neighborhood, event, or some other type of violence where mass murders can occur.  One piece of legislation that will be missing is for Hadiya Pendleton whom was killed by a stray bullet as two rivals shot it out with one another.



[1] Clear out – to remove all persons and property from a certain location by some method of force, usually a drive-by shooting or some other form of gun violence
[2] Spot -  location in which individual is making large amounts of money from an illegal activity
[3] OGs -  original gangster
[4] Hood – the organization or group that an individual is affiliated with through birth, loyalty, or affiliation
[5] Set – the gang in which an individual is affiliated or the gang in which he or she claims
[6] Coming up – being successful or a success in some form of hustle, acquiring all material possessions along with acquired respect
[7] Strap – a hand gun, usually a 9mm, .45, .380, 50 or 40-caliber
[8] Done-up – to kill everyone in sight with your gun; usually occurs when clearing out the spot or gaining respect
[9] Focal concerns – Miller’s theory of crime that reflects an overemphasis on lower-class values
[10] Human Ecology – the study of the interrelationship between human organisms and the physical environment