Thursday, May 29, 2014

A Subscription to Social Interaction


A Subscription to Social Interaction

I.                    Specific Hypothesis

If the complex framework of the structural-functional approach[1] are the theaters of our conscience that control a large percentage of how people interact with us; then like night and day the “arena of inequality” and the theaters of our conscience are co-eternal amongst a society that subscribes to sensory and symbolic deprivation. Then the social-conflict approach[2], which contains two important conflict approaches in society:  Gender-Conflict[3] and Race-Conflict Approach[4], subscribes to symbolic deprivation and its manifest and latent functions, which has a direct effect on how we perform specific task, in a specific manner, at a specific time, causing us to use logic, emotion, external, and internal forces as an excuse when we make decisions in the “arena of inequality” as to why we should ‘not do’ or ‘do’ what messages seep into our conscience directing us, either as a collective or as an individual, “generating conflict and change.”    

II.                 Structural-Function Approach

 

“In 1960 Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin[5] identified three types of illegitimate juvenile subcultures; criminal, conflict, and retreatist.” (Hagen, 2013, p. 164)  This identification condensed two and a half centuries of research, bringing understanding to crime, the criminal element, criminal origins, and how the demonological theory is connected to the origins of crime.  Cloward and Ohlin gave great understanding from a sociological perspective. “At the heart of sociology is a special point of view called the sociological perspective.  Comprised of four basic components that make it unique:  General Social Patterns, Strange in the Familiar, Society in everyday life, Marginally/Crisis.” (University, 2014)     “All social structures, from a simple handshake to complex religious rituals, function to keep society going, at least in its present form.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 14)  When meeting up with friends and/or family to socialize, there is an immediate formal greeting, followed by a communicating of current news or information to one another, and then moving on to the reason for their meeting.  That reason can be the smoking of a blunt, a romantic rendezvous, a church function, school function, etc.  The reason for the meeting is the manifest function, and any unrecognized or unintended consequence of that meeting, whether good or bad, is the latent function.  Social dysfunction comes into play when we are not aware of the messages that seep into our conscience directing us in a certain social pattern of conflict and change.  Sensory deprivation and Symbolic deprivation come through symbols and a person’s status and role, at social functions.  At these social functions when people “don’t hit it off” their theaters conflict, making them socially incompatible.  To sum it all up, how we deal with or respond to these roles, status, and symbols either begin our social constructs of reality or maintain our current social contract, causing us to become socially functional or socially dysfunctional. 

III.               Sensory Deprivation and Symbolic Deprivation

Sensory Deprivation and Symbolic Deprivation are two types of deprivation that are the foundation of what occurs in the “arena of inequality,” and are part of the theme of this research paper.  Sensory and Symbolic deprivation starts out as manifest functions in the “arena of inequality” that leads to latent functions, which are at the root of the sociological approaches, supported by sociological data as evidence supporting my hypothesis.  In chapter 8 of Williams’ & Arrigo’s book, Ethics, Crime, and Criminal Justice (2012), on page 153, they explore Bentham’s Pleasure Principle.  For instance, fecundity is a latent function of sensory and symbolic deprivation as they compare and contrast studying for an exam and going out with friends. Even though you retain all the material you need for a test or class discussion, you miss out on socializing with friends, meeting new people, and/or making new contacts.  In summary, what symbols one uses to identify people, places, things, or events with to acquire a perspective, shows the environment and activities one took part in while developing in the “arena of inequality,” progressing through conflict, and changing physically and morally, using the Social-Conflict Approach.

 

1.      Gender-Conflict focuses on the inequality and conflict between men and women,” (Macionis, 2010, p. 15)  while Gender Stratification “is also about social hierarchy.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 334)  The social hierarchy of Gender Stratification “affects the opportunities and challenges we face throughout our lives.”  “Gender is at work even before the birth of a child, because especially in lower-income nations, parents hope that their firstborn will be a boy rather than a girl.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 332)  Moreover, “Parents even send gender messages in the way they handle infants.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 332)  Most women identify objects, places, and things through sexual objects, private parts, or sexual positions, while most men identify those same objects, places, and things through action and violence.  This fact is supported by Macionis (2010) in his textbook entitled Sociology, on page 332:  “…The female world revolves around cooperation and emotion, and the male world puts a premium on independence and action.”   “[A] national monthly survey of approximately 60,000 households conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  Among the age groupings of those 35 years and older, women had earnings that ranged from 75 percent to 78 percent of the earnings of their male counterparts. Among younger workers, the earnings differences between women and men were not as great.” (Statistics, 2013)  This financial data indicates how the family structure has become co-eternal with the individuals that make up one’s family, and not like it was during the first 80 years of the 20th century. 

2.      Race-Conflict plays a very important role in social interaction.  “This is why sociologist study patterns of” interaction ranging from Assimilation and Segregation to Genocide, Pluralism, and Miscegenation; whether it is a biologically transmitted trait, shared culturally, or just ‘different’ from societal norms.  Race and ethnicity in the United States has always, and will always be a factor in conflict and inequality. “Among both women and men age 25 and older, the weekly earnings of those without a high school diploma ($386 for women and $508 for men) were about two- fifths of those with a bachelor’s degree or higher ($1,001 for women and $1,371 for men) in 2012…earnings for women with a college degree have increased by 28 percent since 1979, while those of male college graduates have risen by [only] 17 percent.” (Statistics, 2013) While “[J]obs with the highest concentration of women” are Cosmetologist (93%), Child Care Workers (94%), and Secretary or Administrative Asst. (96.7%) (Macionis, 2010, p. 335),  “[T]he amount of housework, which is usually considered ‘women’s work’, has gone down since women have started being co-bread winners of their households, but their share of it remains indistinguishable.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 337)  The manifest functions of the law are to maintain order in society, but its latent function produces a hard lesson learned by the individual who breaks the law.  “…the vast majority of those arrested or labeled as criminal are from lower social classes.  Criminality for traditional crimes is higher among lower-class individuals, totally apart from bias in statistics or the administration of justice.  Part of the excessively high rate is likely to be due to their lack of power and sophistication in shielding themselves from formal litigation proceedings.” (Hagen, 2013, p. 65)  In addition, Delbert Elliot’s Integrative Theory “involves synthesizing the gap between aspirations and achievement, attachment and commitment, and exposure to identifying with deviant peers.” (Hagen, 2013, pp. 199-200)  James Flynn, “observed in the 80s that IQ scores had consistently increased in the past decades”… “3 IQ points per decade and thought that intelligence itself had not increased, but abstract problem-solving ability had, making people more intellectually capable”… “Factors that may have played a role are computers, long-schooling, media stimulation, better health and nutrition, and more parental attention (Hagen, 2013, p. 151).  These statistics and facts stratify what symbols are used and the persons that use them in the “arena of inequality,” and how race, gender, and symbols contribute to the constructs of the theaters that play a large role in manifest and latent functions in social interaction. 

3.      “Three waves of feminist movements in the United States” have brought us to 2014, where the woman is equal in every aspect of today’s society.  Feminism is also at the core of sensory and symbolic deprivation.  Sexual activity every day, deprivation of sexual activity, or deprivation of sexual affection can lead to one having feelings of inadequacy which lead to a short temper, committing an act of violence, or withdrawing from society unhealthily.  Even though suicide rates are higher for men than women in the world, in the United States suicide rates in the U.S. “occur where people live far apart from one another.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 14)  The psychology of a woman says while men want to have sex with multiple partners, women want to have sex multiple times with a stable, long-term partner (Kalsher, 2008, p. 310).  This desire to pleasure themselves, derives from a ‘double your pleasure’ and ‘double your fun’ way of thinking by women that is derived from Bentham’s seven pleasure principles.  “It demands immediate, total gratification and is not capable of considering the potential costs of seeking this goal.” (Kalsher, 2008, p. 342)  Somatotypes are body builds that relate to personality characteristics (temperaments).”  They can be found in, The Joint (2014), a local newspaper that features both men and women whom were arrested during a certain time period, one can see that somatotyping is no longer a clear indicator for a man or woman’s personality, but biological theories like Assimilation, Genocide, Segregation, Pluralism, and Miscegenation are key factors in “making us aware of the many ways in which sensory and symbolic deprivation places men and women in positions of power in the “arena of inequality.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 15)  Carol “Gilligan’s work on moral development led her to conclude that there are significant gender differences in the ways men and women respond to moral dilemmas” (Williams & Arrigo, 2012, p. 134).  This is where the true Exchange comes in between men and women.  The exchange is not sex for money, love, etc., but “that morality may very well develop out of more than a[s] single orientation:   one focusing on justice, rights, and logic (for men) and another on interpersonal relationships, compassion, and care (for women)” (Williams & Arrigo, 2012, p. 134) each sex is a delicate counter-balance for the other. 

 

4.      The Symbolic-Interaction Approach is a micro-level orientation, and the “result from the ongoing experiences of tens of millions of people.”  Furthermore, society is nothing more than the shared reality that people construct as they interact (Macionis, 2010, p. 17).  Some symbols are universal while some vary with nationality, race, and ethnicity.  Everything from “[A] word, a whistle, a wall covered in graffiti, a flashing red light, [or] a raised fist” are just some examples of symbols that are used within various cultures through cultural folkways (Macionis, 2010, p. 62).  Some societies create new symbols all the time, like “cyber-symbols” used for texting and/or Instant Messaging.  In The Final Call newspaper (2014), it stated that, “Mr. Powell described what it would be like taking a computer microchip and asking the finest scientists back in the mid-1500s to reverse engineer the technology then explain what it was.  They would not have the technological tools, nor the arc of knowledge to even begin to describe or interpret what they were looking at.” (Muhammad, 2014)    We are in this very context as we have arrived at present day internet.  We have a marvel of technology, but cannot explain past the proverbial depths of what we have.  In “Columbus, Georgia, in front of the River Center, on Broad Street, is located one of the Fountain City’s greatest fountains entitled, DRAMA.”  “The stone water sculpture embodies” technology created by god and man.  “The force of the water and sequencing of lights are all modulated by computer” (Muhr), as is the theaters of our minds.  This symbolic interaction is the basis for the Symbolic-Interaction Approach which plays a large role in constructing the theaters in the human mind, playing at different levels of the conscience and sub-conscience mind.  

 

“Dramaturgical analysis offers a fresh look at the concepts of status and role.  A status is like a part in a play, and a role serves as a script, supplying dialogue and action for the characters.  Goffman described each individual’s “performance” as the presentation of self.” (Macionis, 2010, p. 145) 

 

The manifest function of the first Georgia state constitution was to establish statehood.  It was drafted in 1776, a year later in 1777 another constitution was drafted, “followed by the constitutions of 1789, 1798, 1861, 1877, 1945, 1976, and 1983.” (West, 2006)  Every year this constitution was re-drafted, its latent function evinced a different theater of intelligence being played on the great state of Georgia.  Noah Hutton on his web page, The Beautiful Brain, explains in detail how these theaters are constructed.  “Some cognitive scientists, such as Robert Stickgold of Harvard, have used the relationship between the seen and unseen in theater as a good metaphor for the relationship between the conscious and non-conscious activity in our brains when we sleep. The metaphor goes something like this: One leading theory about sleep, called the activation-synthesis hypothesis, posits that sleep is a time for the brain to sift through all the experiences and thoughts we’ve kept in our short-term buffer throughout the day, decide what’s worth keeping, and then weave those survivors into the complex web of memory we already have within us, for us to carry along until tomorrow, at least. That process happens quite unconsciously– in the “backstage” regions of the mind, as we sleep. This process of sifting– of activation, then synthesis– generates waves of activation throughout the brain, probing neurons that store information not only from what happened that day, but also activating those that deal with longer-term memories that may be of associative use as we try to relate the new stuff to the older stuff, and see how the new memories might be of use in preparing for the future, a constant pursuit of the mind (Hutton, 2012).”  The psychodynamic view of these theaters or dreams are best described by Sigmund Freud as a latent function of the brain,  “…Freud, who popularized the view that dreams reveal the unconscious---thoughts, impulses, and wishes, that lie outside the realm of conscious experience (Kalsher, 2008, pp. 137-138).  If dreams aren’t reflections of hidden wishes or impulses... According to this perspective, dreams are simply our subjective experience of what is, in essence, random neural activity in the brain.” (Kalsher, 2008, p. 138)   Whereas the physiological view suggest the manifest function that “dreams are usually silent, but are filled with visual images.”(Kalsher, 2008, p. 138)  Some dreams cause the individual to experience smells, touch, and taste.  “Those waves of activation end up seeding our dream consciousness– the theory goes– by creating a stream of objects, people, feelings, places, and everything else, that sort of “bubbles up” from that non-conscious background memory-sorting process, and surfaces in our conscious, dream-state. In this sense, it’s that raw material that bubbles up from the backstage process that is seized upon by our conscious minds– the fully-lit, gazed-upon stage of the theater– which then weaves it all together, onstage, into our dream narrative, imposing meaning, as we do, in the strangest–or sometimes most poignant– of places.” (Hutton, 2012)  When our mind shifts back-n-forth between the material and spiritual world, we experience a form of psychosis that is a blessing and a curse at the same time which allows us to see the truth about ourselves, others, situations, and events; taking these treasures of God to enrich our lives, but it is too often we succumb to the pressures of these blessing, committing suicide or homicide. 

IV.             Sociological Data 

Through Sensory and Symbolic deprivation we see how all the approaches of sociology are applied.  In the critical review in Macionis (2010) textbook entitled Sociology, on page 117, it states: 

“Like the work of Piaget, Kohlberg’s model explains moral development in terms of distinct stages.  But whether this model applies to people in all societies remains unclear.  Further, many people in the United States apparently never reach the post-conventional level of moral reasoning, although exactly why is still an open question.  Another problem with Kohlberg’s research is that his subjects were all boys.  He committed a common research error, described in Chapter 2 [of this same text], by generalizing the results of male subjects to all people.”

 

When messages seep into our conscious, they are latent directives from that higher power within ourselves directing us to ‘act as if’, so that the overall plan of the higher power is carried out. Sometimes we are directed to be kind, and don’t feel like being kind, or we are directed to be mean to someone, but danger and common sense says do not.  As human beings we have ‘free will’, and it is this free will that allows us to make the choice of ‘to do’ or ‘not to do’.  This is Civil Disobedience, and “civil disobedience involves a peaceful refusal to obey existing laws that are felt to be unjust---a conscientious disrespect for laws that conflict with one’s commitment to higher ethical principles.” (Williams & Arrigo, 2012, p. 128)  

1.      Society and culture have a lot of influence on the construct of a person’s reality, social media is the biggest influence.  All the mediums that are used for work, rest, and play, are the avenues through which the “arena of inequality” functions, establishing the norms of society; by which rewards and punishments are handed out.  Social Media is a manifest function through which people meet, work, and communicate every day, whether they are on the phone, Facebook chatting, Skyping, or Instant Messaging.  Soul Train was a dance show started by Don Cornelius in 1970, which featured current singers and their music; played for a studio full of guest who would dance to every song for one-hour non-stop.  In 2014 there is no more Soul Train, only reality T.V. shows like, American Idol, Survivor, The Amazing Race, Hell’s Kitchen, using average ordinary everyday type people, truly giving them their 15 minutes of fame.  Made sitcoms out of dramaturgical analysis like Person of Interest, 2 Broke Girls, and Law and Order:  SVU which contains everyday life of our new millennium.  Moving on to movies like Thor:  The Dark World, Captain America:  The Winter Soldier, 42, Wolf on Wall Street and musical creations like Jay-Z’s Magna Carter…Holy Grail.  The protagonist in these movies shows the heroics of men and women from the 80s and 90s, the decades that produced the Millennials.  They show the bias of how real-life heroes were received prior to 1985, in the “Canyon of Heroes” when Vietnam vets were finally hailed for their great sacrifice in the jungles of Vietnam.  With a change in late night talk show host on the Tonight Show and David Letterman, along with Jimmy Kimmel and the return of The Arsenio Hall Show, and all their move from studios in New York to their L.A. counterparts.  Even the game show Jeopardy did a premium show entitled Champion of Decades where champions from the 80s, 90s, up to present day competed against one another in a present day forum, this premium denotes “a shift forward” into a new sociological frontier.  Not only combining sociological theories, but technological devices that were once separate devices like the calculator, planner, phone, laptop, iPAD, Nook, GPS, camera, video camera, phone book, mail, etc., now you can purchase a Nokia 1025 phone that is all these devices, and more, into one; or purchase an app to acquire a feature your phone doesn’t have. The next six questions offer an alternative to how these comforting pieces of technology affect us negatively:  “How many contacts do you have in your cellphone right now? How many of those are personal contacts or business contacts? How many jobs have you held in the past 5 years? Are you still doing the same exact thing that you were doing last year? Are you being targeted on social media? Are you being targeted everywhere you go?” (Wells, 2013).

2.      Georgia’s Safe Carry Protection Act “takes effect July 1” (Howard, 2014)  and the state of Colorado’s recent legalization of marijuana are examples of political structures at work in the “arena of inequality.”  Acts of god are also at work in the “arena of inequality,” evinced by tornados “from Arkansas, Oklahoma and Iowa to Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee,” and North Carolina. (Muskal & Pearce, 2014)  Social structures began changing in the early part of the 20th century as African-Americans began to break the color barrier into Sports, Hollywood, Armed Forces, Medicine, Science, etc.; now African-Americans are breaking a new barrier.  This year during the Nation of Islam’s annual Savior’s Day event, Louis Farrakhan gave a lecture entitled, How Strong is our Foundation:  Can we Survive?   This lecture and its title alone, along with Oprah Winfrey’s new television network, OWN, and the television network, Bounce, is evidence of African-Americans and women [minorities] breaking new barriers in the 21st century.  Turning a once bias into groundbreaking corporate entities.  On the eve when a 17-year old African-American gets accepted into 5 Ivy League colleges,

“Coffey was raised in D.C.’s Ward 8 by his hard-working mother in a single-parent household. Growing up in the less than financially ideal environment—mired in stereotypes and roadblocks—did not discourage Coffey and he offered the following advice to children who struggle in similar circumstances.   Banneker is known for its strict rules, including no cell phones and no going to lockers between classes. According to Principal Anita Berger, the strategy has paid off big time. One hundred percent of Banneker students consistently graduate high school and go on to receive offers from colleges and universities.” (Staff, 2014)

an eighth grade African-American fires a .357 magnum at a rival crew, hitting and killing an innocent bystander.  You can see the bias in comparing and contrasting Khaton and Coffey’s lives in the “arena of inequality.”  Similarly as young African-Americans you can see their promise, but also how they are victims to their own theater of violence (culture) in many ways:

A 14-year-old gunman opened fire during a dispute on a New York City bus in Brooklyn on Thursday evening, fatally shooting a 39-year-old passenger in the head.  The attack happened about 6:20 p.m. on a B15 bus on Marcus Garvey Boulevard near Lafayette Avenue in Bedford-Stuyvesant. The police said there was an argument involving several teenagers on the bus, though they did not know what it was about. The gunman fired more than one shot, the police said, and witnesses described hearing three or four” (Lee, 2014)

Another interpretation of these two young men’s lives, who went in two different directions is,  Ivy League or Penitentiary, whether higher or lower, all institutions promote some form of learning. This is clear evidence of new theaters emerging. 

V.                Conclusion

The theaters in our conscience are our body’s biological and natural security app that sets up a world, in our heads, that takes care of us. Those theaters that are closer to the forefront of our mind is based on our working memory (short-term memory), and those in the deeper levels of the sub-conscience are based on our unemployed memory (long-term memory) (Kalsher, 2008, p. 203).  Our working memory is the foundation for our overall intelligence, and is activated by using internal and external retrieval cues (Kalsher, 2008, pp. 204-5).  Symbolic deprivation produces conflict in the “arena of inequality.”  This type of deprivation begins the “social constructs of our reality” in the theaters of our minds,  setting forth stipulations in social contracts, which will cause others and ourselves, to identify status, role, sets, skills, abilities, limits, beliefs, personality types, and “social construction of emotions and how we manage them.”  As a result, some are very successful in the “arena of inequality” while others succumb to the pressures of conflict leading to sensory deprivation, which is a more severe form of deprivation. Furthermore, how we maintain that reality is determined by how the external world upholds to the stipulations set forth in our social contract.  Because the “arena of inequality” always produces conflict, challenges to our contract, in whole or in part, keeps constant upgrades on that contract.  These theaters determine our personal space in social interaction, helping us identify boundaries in the “arena of inequality” that must be protected.   As a result we protect ourselves, the symbols in our theaters, and maintain our contract by being aggressive and/or on the offensive, assertive, and/or “defensive to some kind of attack.” (Wikipedia, 2014)  In the process of protecting our personal space we produce conflict and change, declaring our independence in the “arena of inequality,” utilizing the eight principles of felicity calculus.  Cultural universals are contained in all societies and cultures, but the difference in symbols within those societies and cultures are based on race, gender, age, and income class.  It is through interaction that we transform elements of the world into symbols that stimulate us on a consistent basis wherever we may go. The Symbolic-Interaction Approach forms the self, according to George Mead’s theory of social behaviorism, via social experience (Macionis, 2010, p. 118).  We socially interact throughout our daily lives, pursuing short and long term objectives, conforming to socioeconomic folkways and norms. 



[1] Structural-Functional Approach – framework for building theory that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.
[2] Social-Conflict Approach – framework for building theory that sees society as an “arena of inequality” that generates conflict and change.
[3] Gender-Conflict Approach – a point of view that focuses on inequality and conflict between women and men.
[4] Race-Conflict Approach – point of view that focuses on inequality and conflict between people of different racial and ethnic categories.
[5] Differential opportunity theory – working class juveniles will choose one or another type of gang adjustment to their anomic situation depending on the availability of illegitimate opportunity structures in their neighborhood.  Hagen, F. E. (2013). Introduction to Criminology: Theories, Methods, and Criminal Behavior 8th ed. In F. E. Hagen, Introduction to Criminology: Theories, Methods, and Criminal Behavior 8th ed. (p. 164). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

No comments:

Post a Comment